Weighbridges
Weighbridge
Type
Some years ago NDOT developed 3 standard
weighbridge specifications, as
follows:
A Grade
:
An “A” grade weighbridge
installation is the description which is given to 2
weighbridge stations opposite each other on a high
traffic volume roadway, each station covering a separate
traffic direction.
The weighbridges are (full
truck length) 22 metre scales, each comprising 4 separate
weigh decks, to weigh the vehicle axle groups
individually.
Each installation has a
substantial truck park-off
area.
B Grade
:
One 22 metre platform scale
weighbridge situated on a road route of medium traffic
volume; with a smaller truck park-off
area.
C Grade
:
One 3 x 4 metre platform
scale weighbridge situated on a road of relatively low
traffic volume, with limited or no truck park-off
area.
A 3 x 4 platform scale is
capable of weighing a tridem axle group and is the
minimum size scale acceptable for weighing axle groups
for overload prosecutions.
The old “single bar” or
single axle scales are not acceptable in court for axle
group prosecutions.
When these A, B, and C grading
specifications were designed during the early 1990’s,
there was also an attempt to link the weighbridge type or
grade to manning hours; i.e. An A grade must be manned 24
hours per day and a C grade should be manned for more
than 2 or 3 days per week. A rigid
system such as this is not preferable and can easily lead
to unproductivity and a waste of resources. Manning
programmes must be flexible and cannot be dictated by the
size of weighbridge.
Most of the weighbridges as indicated in
table 1 are provincial weighbridges and some weighbridges
are no longer operational. The municipal weighbridges are
primarily used for licensing purposes and overloading
enforcement of smaller truck configurations. The highest
numbers of heavy vehicles weighed were in
the Western
Cape, Mpumalanga, KZN and Limpopo. However, the highest percentage of
vehicles overloaded above the 5% grace in comparison to
the number of vehicles weighed were found to be in the
provinces of the Eastern Cape with 34%, Limpopo with 13%
and the North West with
9%.
Maintaining the Standard of
Weighbridges
The Eastern Cape Provincial Department
of Roads and Transport has the responsibility for
ensuring that all weighbridges in the province are fully
functional and accurate at all times. All weighbridges
should be tested and calibrated bi-annually and
maintained on a daily basis. When necessary, equipment
should be upgraded to ensure that standards are
maintained.
Status Quo of weighbridges in
the Eastern
Cape
There are 2 provincial weighbridges and
1 municipal weighbridge in the Eastern Cape where overloading is enforced .
Although operational it is used on an adhoc basis. The 2
provincial weighbridges are
namely:
The Umtata TCC is currently not
operational. It is situated on the N2, approximately 2 km
to the west of Umtata, opposite the Ultra City. It has a 3 x 4m
platform.
The Kinkelbos TCC is a new facility that
was completed during 2004 and is operational. It is
situated approximately 40 km northeast
of Port
Elizabeth on the
N2. It has a 3 x4m platform. This facility is equipped
with a brake tester as well as a vehicle pit to examine
vehicles. This weighbridge facility, according to various
sources within the transport industry, monitors vehicles
on an adhoc basis.
 
Overloading control was consistently done on
the Port Elizabeth municipal weighbridge
from 1996 to 1999. Overloading control is still enforced
in the area, but with less intensity.
Construction and upgrading of
proposed weighbridge
facilities
As part of the National Overload Control
Strategy developed for the national Department of
Transport by the CSIR, a review of Eastern Cape provincial overload
control strategies was carried out. Some of the findings
were related to the proposed weighbridge sites, the
proposed site according the ADTT and in relation to major
corridors.

Figure 1 Major corridors for the
movement of heavy vehicles in the Eastern
Cape
The proposed TCCs in the
Eastern
Cape in priority
order, as contained in the Eastern Cape section of the National Overload
Control Strategy, are shown in the table
below.
Table 1
Proposed TCCs in
the Eastern
Cape
|
Priority
|
Description
|
Remarks
|
Route
|
|
1
|
Graaff-Reinet
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading
|
N9
|
|
2
|
Aliwal
North
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading
|
N6
|
|
3
|
Cradock
|
New
site
|
N10
|
|
4
|
Van Stadens
(Witteklip)
|
New site (west of
Port
Elizabeth)
|
N2
|
|
5
|
Middelburg
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading
|
N9/N10
|
|
6
|
Queenstown
|
New
site
|
N6
|
|
7
|
East
London
|
New site (north-east of
East
London)
|
N2
|
|
8
|
East
London
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading (west of East
London)
|
R72
|
Table 2
Proposed and existing TCCs
prioritised in terms of
ADTT
|
Priority
|
Description
|
Remarks
|
Route
|
|
1
|
Van Stadens
(Witteklip)
|
New site (west of
Port
Elizabeth)
|
N2
|
|
2
|
Kinkelbos
|
Recently commissioned
site
|
N2
|
|
3
|
Umtata
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading
|
N2
|
|
4
|
East
London
|
New site (north-east of
East
London)
|
N2
|
|
5
|
Middelburg
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading
|
N9/N10
|
|
6
|
Aliwal
North
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading
|
N6
|
|
6
|
Queenstown
|
New
site
|
N6
|
|
7
|
Cradock
|
New
site
|
N10
|
|
8
|
Graaff-Reinet
|
Existing site requiring
upgrading
|
N9
|
The proposed site west of
East
London on the
R72 is the only site on a major corridor where no traffic
counts were available.
Table 3
Proposed and existing TCCs
in relation to major
corridors
|
TCC
|
Major
Corridors
|
|
N2
|
N6
|
N9
|
N10
|
R56
|
R61
|
R72
|
R75
|
|
Aliwal
North
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cradock
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
East London
(north)
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East London
(west)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Graaff-Reinet
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Kinkelbos
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middelburg
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Queenstown
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Umtata
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Van Stadens
(Witteklip)
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the major corridors would be
adequately covered by the existing and proposed TCCs,
with the exception of the R56 and the
R75.
N2
The N2 would be covered by four TCCs of
which two (Van Stadens and Umtata) would be close to where the N2 enters
and leaves the Eastern Cape.
The other two (Kinkelbos
and East
London) would cover
the central portion of the
N2.
N6
The N6 would have a TCC where it enters
the Eastern
Cape at Aliwal
North, one in the middle section (at Queenstown) and one
where the N6 ends at East London.
N9
The N9 would have one TCC close to the
point where it enters the Eastern Cape at Middelburg and a second TCC in
the middle section (at
Graaff-Reinet).
N10
The N10 would have one TCC close to the
point where it enters the Eastern Cape at Middelburg, a
second TCC in the middle section at Cradock and a third
TCC where the N10 joins the N2 close to
Kinkelbos.
Depending on the volume of heavy vehicles, it may be
necessary to construct a satellite station at the
intersection of the N2 and the N10 to monitor heavy
vehicles travelling from Grahamstown on the N2 and the
turning right onto the N10. If the
volumes are low, regular screening with a portable scale
may be adequate.
R56
The R56 would only be covered by one TCC
at Middelburg, which is the one end of the
route.
Depending on the traffic
volumes it may be necessary to have another facility on
the R56 and Elliot may be the appropriate
location.
A TCC at Elliot would cover
the R56; the R58 from Aliwal North, which is an
alternative route to travel to Umtata; and the R396 which
is a link between the N2 north of Umtata and the
R56.
R61
The R61 would be covered by the existing
TCC at Umtata, a second TCC at Queenstown and a third
TCC at Cradock.
R72
The R72, which is an alternative route
between East London and Port Elizabeth, would be covered by two TCCs at both
ends.
At the one end it would be
the proposed TCC west of East London and at the other end it is the
existing TCC at Kinkelbos on the N2, a short distance
after the R72 joins the
N2.
R75
The R75 would only be covered by one TCC
at Graaff-Reinet.
It is recommended that a
site for a second TCC be identified in the vicinity of
Despatch or Uitenhage.
This would result in the R75
being covered at both
ends.
In terms of the number of major routes
covered by a TCC, the proposed facility at
Middelburg would have the highest priority,
as it would cover the N9, N10 and R56.
It would also cover traffic
travelling on the R61 and then turning north on the N10
to travel to the Northern Cape or the Free State.
The proposed TCCs at Cradock, East London (north), Graaff-Reinet and Queenstown would all cover
two major routes. Of
these, Queenstown should have the
highest priority, as it would be the only facility in the
north-western part of the Eastern Cape. It
would cover the N6, which is the route from Gauteng via the Free State to East London and
Umtata. It
would also cover the R61, which has recently been
upgraded by SANRAL.
Proposed type of
weighbridge
Fixed
weighbridges
The types of permanent weighbridges
proposed for the Eastern Cape facilities similar to what has
been provided at Kinkelbos.
These facilities would
primarily be equipped with an axle unit scale consisting
of a single deck 3.2m wide and 4m long being capable of
weighing a maximum mass of
40 000kg.
Where the traffic volumes warrant it a
multi-deck scale consisting of four individual decks with
lengths of 3m, 6m, 7m and 6m respectively, giving an
overall length of 22m, with a width of 3.2m should be
provided.
Each deck must be capable of
weighing a maximum mass of 40 000kg, giving a total
weighing capacity of
160 000kg.
A standard requirement at all TCCs should be
a roof over the scale as has been provided at
Kinkelbos. This
will improve the working conditions and will make it
possible to do weighing in all weather
conditions.
Weigh-in-motion
equipment (Wim)
The provision of high-speed
weigh-in-motion (HSWIM) equipment on either side of the
approaches to TCCs, connected to monitors inside the
vehicle of a traffic officer, is an efficient mechanism
to achieve manpower and infrastructure effectiveness.
This will also enable the Department to gather accurate
information on traffic volumes and overloading control
from which the maintenance plans can be accurately
calculated and law enforcement activities co-
ordinated.
It is more appropriate on high volume
roads, but can also be effective on lower volume roads
for both screening and traffic data
collection.
The use of HSWIM equipment
will lead to less legal vehicles being weighed
statically.
The total number of vehicles
that has to be weighed at a TCC will therefore be less
and a smaller facility may then be
adequate.
The HSWIM equipment can also
provide valuable traffic data that can be used to monitor
trends and to schedule shifts to ensure the maximum
effect.
The information can also be
used by other departments, such as for long term road
planning and maintenance planning.
It is therefore recommended
that HSWIM equipment be provided at each
TCC.
A weigh in motion sensor being
installed
Vehicle load
monitors
Where satellite stations are not
warranted, at least one set of portable dynamic scales
should be supplied to each TCC.
These portable dynamic
scales can be set-up next to any road where there is a
suitable surface and an area to pull off and weigh
trucks.
These scales cannot be used
for law enforcement purposes, but are sufficiently
accurate to identify vehicles that are probably
overloaded with a high degree of
confidence.
When screening vehicles on
alternative or escape routes, a number of overloaded
vehicles should be identified and then escorted in a
convoy to the TCC to be weighed on the static scale for
prosecution purposes. This process was effectively done
by the PE traffic department on the N2 from 1996 to 1999,
with the assistance of the E.Cape TMT survey
team.
Due to the fairly high accuracy of the
portable dynamic scales, screening can take place at
considerable distances from the TCC, as the chance of
diverting vehicles that are legally loaded to the TCC is
slim.
Diversion distances of up to
100km are reasonable.

Survey being conducted via the
VLM
|